HOLLIE GREIG THE QUESTIONS

when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police to question the alleged perpetrators without delay;


when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police immediately to search the homes of those named for corroborative evidence;



when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to seize and examine the computers of those named at the earliest opportunity;


when allegations of rape are supported by evidence from well-respected medical and psychological experts who unanimously confirm not only that systematic abuse has taken place, but go so far as to name two of the most likely perpetrators, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe it right to dismiss their testimony and allow those named to leave the country;


when a school doctor twice reports an under-age girl to be at risk, and that girl’s headmaster - one of those subsequently named as a serial rapist - consistently fails to alert the child’s mother or to take any steps to protect her, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe this to be the normal behaviour of a responsible, and guiltless, person;


when a case of rape is reported by a girl with speech difficulties, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to supply her with support during police interviews, but are happy to use her handicap, in this respect, to discredit her spoken evidence;


when a case of repeated multiple gang rape over many years is reported by a young girl who also names seven fellow victims, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe that, in view of the Scottish law regarding corroboration, it is absolutely essential that the police question those she has named immediately.


When an acknowledged victim of rape receives a substantial award from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, you, as representative of the Crown Office, feel justified in continuing to maintain that the allegations on which this award was based were fully investigated and found to be false.

HOAXER TALK

HOAXER TALK


We believe, beyond reasonable doubt, that Hollie Greig was abused and has been badly let down by the Scottish justice system and that this same system has treated Robert Green disgracefully.We are very angry and upset that the words and actions of a number of misguided people who think of themselves as supporters of Hollie and Robert, have created the present situation where this gravely serious case has been reduced to a farce.


Sarah McLeod



JUST WEEKS LATER


MCLEOD WAS SAYING IT WAS A HOAX

Mar 10

Sarah McLeod you are quite correct Danny, the evidence was never there to start with and the story
was used to appeal to people on a visceral
level, both of the HG case and now the
Hampstead one. Have you ever tried
appealing to BGs sensible side about
either cases?

Monday, 29 June 2015

JANNER ...COME ON DOWN


Ageing UK peer to be prosecuted for sex crimes after decision reversed


Reuters

LORD JANNER TALKS AT A NEWS CONFERENCE.© REUTERS LORD JANNER TALKS AT A NEWS CONFERENCE. British prosecutors said on Monday an ageing member of the House of Lords would now face criminal action over accusations of serious historical child sex crimes after they overturned an earlier decision following anger from alleged victims.
Lord Greville Janner, 86, a former Labour member of parliament and ex-president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, is accused of more than 20 offences on former residents of children's homes in the 1970s and 1980s.
In April, Alison Saunders, Britain's Director of Public Prosecutions said there was evidence to bring charges against Janner, who has always denied any wrongdoing, over 16 allegations of indecent assaults and six other counts.
But she said he was not fit to plead or give evidence because he was suffering from severe dementia and so a trial could not take place.
Britain is holding a wide-ranging inquiry into allegations of abuse by high-profile figures including politicians, several police investigations have begun and critics said the decision added to a perception that the establishment was closing ranks.
Six complainants asked for the matter to be reconsidered using a recently introduced scheme called the Victims' Right to Review, which allows them to have their cases looked at again. That review concluded it was in the public interest for the case to go before the courts.
"I have always said that in my view this was an extremely difficult and borderline case because of the strong arguments on both sides," Saunders said.
Allegations against Janner first arose in 1991 when he was named as having abused a teenage boy during a trial of a children's home manager in Leicestershire, central England, who was jailed for abusing children.
Janner, who was the subject of three investigations between 1991 and 2007, denied the allegations in parliament, but Saunders said both the CPS and police had made mistakes in not acting against him sooner.
"It is a matter of real regret that prosecutions weren’t brought by the police and CPS in the past," Saunders said.
She said the assumption would be that Janner would be found unfit to plead, and thus there would only be a "trial of the facts", with the most likely outcome being an absolute discharge which was neither a punishment nor conviction.
Janner's case has been listed for London's Westminster Magistrates' Court on Aug. 7, and the CPS said it would be for the court to decide whether he should be excused on medical grounds from attending.
(Reporting by Michael Holden; editing by Stephen Addison)

https://twitter.com/Buffalohair

International

 https://twitter.com/Buffalohair

 

News Video and Resource Portal

UK Pedophile News: Pedophile Protecting Prosecuter Alison Saunders: “I Will Not Resign Over Epic Child Sexual Abuse Case Against Lord Greville Janner “

COMMUNITIES OF SATANISTS

Monday, 29 June 2015

- THEY HAD BEEN TO A RITUAL??

"Driving late at night a few years ago (on highway 520) I witnessed an incredible display of traffic coming from and or near the Bellevue Microsoft complex at a time in the whee morning hours when any type of traffic should not have normally been visible. The immensity of this traffic was that of something resembling the end of a Super Bowl event. Also noticed that night was a huge amount of traffic coming from the region of Enumclaw Washington, and I had checked the news papers that next day and there were no known festivities of any kind resembling or thereof relating to this amount of traffic being observed at this time of day. A few weeks ago on the night of the Full Moon, I had noticed that right at midnight that most of the night spots located in Kirkland Washington all emptying out. Many or most of these locations customers had visibly observed leaving in droves from these night spots to go somewhere else. Where were they all going? Why were these upper crust patrons all leaving to go somewhere else? Why are only specific types of people, (if they are people) allowed to have wealth and employment here in the Northwest and what about these secret and hidden hierarchies that reign and control this entire Northwest region?

 2010, February 28, 16:40 Sunday morning.


  Several construction workers once had mentioned to me (several years ago) who were construction workers who had worked in the construction of the Microsoft complex (located in the Bellevue and Kirkland - Redmond area) that are facilities that are located in Redmond and Bellevue Washington had mentioned that they had worked in deep underground linked facilities and they had noticed non human type being in these areas of these deep underground complexes in areas that were off limits to these (human) construction workers. Also, several people who usually commuted down the highway 520 corridor in the early morning hours had mentioned that they had witnessed what appeared to be non human types of entities driving in vehicles that were observed leaving the Microsoft campus. These same types of observations were also noted being related to the Boeing complexes as well. Also, mentioned to me were the circumstances of Boeing being tied to this vast Satanist network and that there are locations on or near the Boeing complexes where human bodies or thereof, people who were sacrificially murdered thus being buried on or near the Boeing company facilities. Especially burial sites that are linked to to the Everett Boeing Aircraft facility. Especially linking to areas where this very complex Satanist community is located (just by coincidence?) near the Boeing complexes where these Satanists are also known to be cannibals, and human flesh eaters.
 It gets a lot more poignant and I do not have enough time right now to report all that I have observed but this report is a start.


  Also, shown to me are the communities of Satanists that live near the Boeing facilities, and that the Boeing Black Box facilities tie keenly into vast underground complexes that appear to merely nests of Satanists and Lucifer-ian memberships tying directly to the heads of the Boeing company. Washington State provides the perfect environment for this all powerful Satanist (Crime Family infrastructure) Crime Syndicate to be able to do what ever they want to do including their literally defrauding and destroying anyone that they deem a target like for example here is just one example of what they can do and their is no one or group who is capable of standing up to them, who is not a part of the Satanist Crime Society. http://www.iahf.com/usa/20010506.html


Consider that the whole state of Washington is nothing but a Crime Family - Crime Syndicate that is run by the Maxwell Crime Family who own all or most of the Casinos, all of the land that the Casinos sit upon, most of the Strip Bars and to also let be known, that literally the Governor, the States Two U.S. (corporate U.S. not the U.S.A.) Senate Members, most of this state's political representation that have a key and significant position of power, and as well as the heads of the Mob here. Including most of the Federal Judiciary, and the Superior Court Judiciary who are all in some way or another all related to one another and or they are all apart of this secret and hidden Satanist empire or they would not be allowed to be in power or be allowed to hold any positions of executive level office. But all just by coincidence though.


  Results 1 - 10 of about 1,090,000 for Washington State Constitutional Fraud.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=Washington+State+Constitutional+Fraud&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= "
http://www.crtf.org/fraud.html

GEORGE GALLOWAY CSA

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5605/mark-watts-tells-rt-s-sputnik-about-britain-s-biggest-scandal



THE FILM THEY DONT WONT YOU TO SEE








http://www.mediafire.com/watch/j77xleo6nf8vz1l/TRAFFIC_by_Pete_Middleton_Pitures.mp4

A Message from Mr. Robert Green For All You Brave Hearts & Souls


Dr Jack Boyle wrote that “Hollie is truthful and is describing sexual abuse”.



Dr Jack Boyle wrote that “Hollie is truthful and is describing sexual abuse”.


HE ISNT AN IDIOT HE IS ONE OF SCOTLAND'S MOST FOREMOST CHILD ABUSE EXPERTS ,


DONT YOU  THINK HE KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FANTASY BOYFRIEND AND RAPE?

ROBERT GREEN CANT TALK BUT HE CAN SING :YOU CANT PUT A GOOD MAN DOWN

https://youtu.be/01PQoI8H5mg

RUSSEL BURTON SPEAKS

https://youtu.be/OPICDqwsv_I

AND SO THE WORD SPREADS

https://buffalohair.wordpress.com/2015/06/29/uk-pedophile-news-mr-robert-green-singing-his-song-after-being-banned-from-discussing-royal-elitist-sexual-abuse-of-holly-greig-by-scotish-court/#comment-22489


UK Pedophile News: Mr. Robert Green Singing His Song After Being Banned From Discussing Royal Elitist Sexual Abuse of Holly Greig by Scotish Court

No Responses Yet to “UK Pedophile News: Mr. Robert Green Singing His Song After Being Banned From Discussing Royal Elitist Sexual Abuse of Holly Greig by Scotish Court”

TICK TOCK JANNER

Lord Janner: Case puts spotlight on legal options

  • 6 hours ago
  • From the section UK
A decision not to bring criminal proceedings against Lord Greville Janner has been overturned by an independent QC.
It has come about as a result of the Victims' Right to Review system.
The Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, has said she made the "right decision" not to prosecute Lord Janner over child sex allegations, saying his dementia was so severe that he could "play no part in a trial".
This Crown Prosecution Service review system has only been around for a couple of years and is a very democratic means for victims to review decisions of prosecutors not to charge alleged defendants.

Review guidelines

Under the system, the director of public prosecutions is treated in the same way as any other prosecutor.
The Crown Prosecution website says: "The review will comprise a reconsideration of the evidence and public interest i.e. a reviewing prosecutor, independent of the original decision, will approach the case afresh to determine whether the original decision was right or wrong."
In the case of Lord Janner, Alison Saunders' decision was not based on the evidence that Lord Janner committed the alleged sexual offences - that was sufficient for there to be a realistic prospect of a conviction - but on the application of the public interest test.
She decided that, based upon the medical evidence of irreversible dementia, it was not in the public interest to prosecute Lord Janner, who was not fit to take part in any proceedings.
It has never been part of our criminal justice system to force those who lack mental capacity to take part in criminal trials where they cannot understand the proceedings or instruct their lawyers.
Lord Janner and his family have always denied any wrongdoing.

Trial options

There are two ways to determine whether a person is "fit to plead" i.e. mentally capable of taking part in criminal proceedings.
It can be determined by the CPS as it was here, or it can be done by a judge.
If he decides Lord Janner is fit to stand trial, a normal trial will take place. If he decides the peer isn't fit, there can be what's known as a trial of the facts, with a jury.
Alison Saunders has defended her decision not to prosecute Lord Janner
This is a little used process governed by the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964.
The word insanity gives a clue as to the purpose of a trial of the facts.
It is used when a court needs to impose a hospital or supervision order under the Mental Health Act on a defendant who lacks mental capacity.
So, it would be used, for example, in a murder case where the defendant lacks capacity, and needs to be hospitalised to protect himself and the public.
In order to do that, the court has to establish that the accused did the physical acts of the crime. It cannot go into the mental elements i.e. intention or any of the defences to the charge.

Three outcomes

There are only three possible outcomes from a trial of the facts. They are a hospital order, a supervision order or an absolute discharge.
The jury can only make a finding that the defendant did the particular physical act. There cannot be a verdict of guilty.
Such a trial recently took place in the case of the former Luton South MP Margaret Moran, who was accused of falsely claiming more than £53,000 in parliamentary expenses.
She was given a two-year supervision order.
In Lord Janner's case, the process would involve the alleged victims giving evidence.
Lord Janner, pictured here with Tony Blair, has done nothing wrong, his family say
This might be done by the jury seeing video evidence of something called the "achieving best evidence" interviews, given by victims to specialist police officers.
This is fairly standard in cases of serious sexual offences and is designed to avoid the trauma of having to give live evidence of the events.

Legal opposition

However, the victims would then be cross-examined by defence counsel live - although special measures are available so that evidence can be given from behind screens or by a video-link to a room outside the courtroom itself.
A trial of the facts would most likely be strenuously opposed by Lord Janner's legal team, who would argue it was an abuse of the court process to subject him to any sort of trial where there had been so much adverse pre-trial publicity.
They might argue that, in his case, the publicity was especially adverse as the media might have thought, following the DPP's original decision, that there would never be any sort of criminal trial.
Lord Janner's legal team could also try to judicially review the decision to bring proceedings. They would have to persuade a judge that the decision to bring proceedings was so unreasonable as to be unlawful.

LETS TALK


Wrexham child sex abuse

Op Pallial: Fourth man guilty of Wrexham child sex abuse

George Neil Phoenix, 63, from Wrexham, has been convicted of indecent assault
A fourth man has been convicted of historical sexual abuse against children in Wrexham during the 1980s.
George Neil Phoenix, 63, from the town, was found guilty of one charge of indecent assault in a majority verdict by the jury.
It was the seventh day of deliberations by the panel, which is still considering outstanding charges against another two men.
Three others have also been convicted of a series of offences.
Victims were assaulted at sex parties, the trial at Mold Crown Court has heard.
A seventh man, Roger Griffiths, 76, of Wrexham, was cleared on Friday, after a trial which started in April.
The men were arrested as part of the Operation Pallial investigation into historical abuse across north Wales.
The jury will resume deliberations again on Tuesday after being sent home for the evening.
Keith Stokes and Edward Huxley are still awaiting verdicts

Verdicts so far

  • Former wrestler Gary Cooke, 64, of Leicester, guilty of 11 charges of indecent assault, three serious sexual assaults, and two charges of indecency with a child
  • Ex-bar owner David Lightfoot, 72, of Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, guilty of six charges of indecent assault on a male, two serious sexual assaults and an attempted serious sexual assault. He was cleared of one charge of indecency with a child
  • Former radio DJ Roy Norry, 55, from Connah's Quay, was found guilty of five indecent assaults on a male and one serious sexual assault. He was cleared of attempted serious sexual assault and indecent assault
  • George Phoenix, 63, of Wrexham, guilty of one indecent assault
  • Keith Stokes, 62, from Farndon, Chester, cleared of one charge of indecency with a child - but several other charges are still being considered
  • Edward Huxley, 70, of Cookham, Berkshire, is charged with two counts of indecent assault - verdicts still being considered
  • Roger Griffiths, 76, of Wrexham, cleared of two charges of indecent assault. He was released by the court on Friday.

JERSEY MUPPETRY

HOW 26 JERSEY (MUPPETS) POLITICIANS KILLED OFF SCRUTINY WITH ONE PUSH OF A BUTTON


CHIEF MINISTER GORST & TREASURY MINISTER Maclean


THESE STATES MEMBERS SHOULD RESIGN. 
THE STATES OF JERSEY



THE DEATH OF DEMOCRACY 



WE ARE GOVERNED BY COMPLETE AND UTTER MUPPETS (APART FROM THE ODD DECENT ONES)



WE HAVE NEVER HAD IT SO BAD



 SCRUTINY IS NOW OFFICIALLY OBSOLETE AND DEAD


Play the official anthem of the States of Jersey whilst reading this post.



LYRICS
t's time to play the music
It's time to light the lights
t's time to meet the Muppets on the Muppet Show tonight.

It's time to put on makeup
It's time to dress up right
It's time to raise the curtain on the Muppet Show tonight.

Why do we always come here
I guess we'll never know
It's like a kind of torture
To have to watch the show

And now let's get things started
Why don't you get things started
It's time to get things started
On the most sensational inspirational celebrational Muppetational
This is what we call the Muppet Show!


Scrutiny is a function that is there to scrutinise  government policy and procedure - it is evidence based and it serves to help states members come to an informed decision based on the facts before taking a vote on our behalf. 

26 of our states members unbelievably ignored scrutiny and intern the democratic purpose. They should be made to resign their seats as states members and representatives of the public.

On the 16/06/2015 Deputy Tadier brought P.44/2015 asking the states to halt  work on the finance quarter for 6 weeks until the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel had concluded their report. 26 of our Muppet states members decided that they would vote blind and kill off scrutiny in one push of a button. This is shocking. This isn't about a building on the Esplanade Car Park  this is about democracy or the death of it. What is the purpose of scrutiny when it continues to be ignored? The executive will back scrutiny when it suits their agenda. How many of those 26 sit on scrutiny panels themselves? Why didn't they support the process they are apart of? 

We are now seeing party politics under the guise of collective responsibility. It's the party of the quangos. 

Deputy Tadier attempted to follow the democratic process by calling a parish meeting in St Brelade where the parishioners voted unanimously to support his proposition and what did the democratically elected representatives of that parish do? (apart from Deputy Tadier) 

Constable Steve Pallett - Deputy Norton and Deputy Truscott ignored the wishes of their parishioners and voted with the quango. This is the caliber of the politicians we are now dealing with. They are only self interested as they vote with the executive so they can gain future favour. This is blindingly obvious 

We must remember that this is the most illegitimate parliament this island has seen for decades. 2/3rds of them were elected unopposed and that includes 11 out of the 12 constables. They will always back the executive. They are ignoring scrutiny and in doing so ignoring the democratic process.

THE MEDIA

The Jersey Mainstream Media should be taking these 26 Muppets to the cleaners. They should be asked to resign their posts or at the very least asked to justify their actions in a very robust manner. The seriousness of what these 26 did cannot be understated. The media should not let them off the hook. It is bad enough that these 26 anti democrats didn't wait for scrutiny but what if scrutiny comes back with a damning report plus confirming that they have been withheld crucial documents to help them come to an informed opinion. Documents only get withheld when they don't show you in a good light. The 26 need to be challenged on a public platform. It will be interesting to see the actions of the Jersey State Media when the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel report is released. Although the damage has already been done and Scrutiny is buried. It matters little if the report is glowing or damning the 26 have killed scrutiny and democracy. 


What we have are states members (mostly unelected)  trying to cement their future ministerial and assistant ministerial positions. 


Everybody who sits on scrutiny should resign 


Will The Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel be considering their position after the publication of their report? 


In my opinion the States of Jersey as it currently stands should be disbanded. They are failing the people of Jersey. To go forward blindly is unforgivable. We are governed by Muppet's who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the chamber let alone allow them to push buttons when voting. 


Rico Sorda

Part Time Investigative Journalist

6 comments:

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...
Rico, the "Scrutiny function" of the Jersey legislature is a fake - a Potemkin village - like every other component of the Jersey polity.

When "scrutiny" is fake - it's a Potemkin village - of a Potemkin village.

But we've known the Jersey legislature "Scrutiny function" was fake - worse than fake - as long ago as 2008.

That was when the "Scrutiny Panel" with responsibility for overseeing social services - led as the Panel then was by Alan Breckon and Geoff Southern - helped the Jersey oligarchy to cover-up decades of child-abuse.

Remind me - what official functions does Geoff Southern hold now?

Stuart
Anonymous said...
An illegitimate government making decisions in favour of a quango and against its electorate is as bad as it gets. You have got this to a T rico they are a bunch of Muppets who have no mandate to make decisions for an island who didn't vote for them.
Anonymous said...
Should we start a campaign to replace the dean reading out the lord's prayer at the start of states sittings with the Muppet show song? It's certainly more fitting.
Anonymous said...
Good blog Rico and as always bang on the money with your unique style of telling it how is. You should stand for election the States need people like you.
Anonymous said...

Good post Rico, and yes the 26 should never get a seat in Government next time around.

If scrutiny find that the Ministers have backed Buzz Henry (light on giving out information) of the States of Jersey Dell boy Clan and the figures show a loss, there must be a big public demonstration showing the feelings of all classes that will be paying for this balls up, and demanding the shutting down of SDC before they get hold of other valuable public property.

This island belongs to it's people not 26 muppets that pretend to be good at business, but are utter failures.
Anonymous said...
It's worse than that. Jersey's polity - its government and crown appointees - are a criminal enterprise with many examples of misconduct in a public office and outright criminality at catastrophic levels. The Queen - with her letters patent - let these gangsters and spivs commit all of their crimes in her name while she turns a blind eye and that is where the problem is. It's not the clowns you have elected - it's the clowns the Queen has elected - who are the problem and the buck stops with her.

ROBERT GREEN SINGS THE JAIL HOUSE BLUES, YOU CANT KEEP AN HONEST MAN DOWN


Sunday, 28 June 2015

Janner to face child abuse charges

Diaspora

Independent review calls for Janner to face child abuse charges despite dementia

Jerusalem Post correspondent LONDON – Lord Greville Janner, 86, will be told Monday that despite officially being ruled too ill to face trial, months of persistent complaints from alleged victims of historic child sex abuse claimed to have been committed by him, will result in charges and a court case.

However Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions, who only three months ago controversially ruled Janner could not be charged as he was in no state to defend himself – a decision taken on the advice of four independent examining doctors, two instructed by the prosecuting authorities and two by lawyers of his alleged victims – may face renewed criticism and could be forced out of her job, over her initial decision.

An independent senior lawyer who undertook a review of the evidence, which included claims by at least a dozen people of 22 sexual offenses from the 1960s to 1980s, has decided that a court case must be held to allow for a “trial of the facts” even though Janner – who all agree has advanced dementia – will not be present as he is judged to be too ill to engage in the court process in any meaningful way.

The news will upset his family, who have constantly maintained he is “entirely innocent of any wrongdoing” and disappoint many of his friends and colleagues and those who worked for him throughout his legal, parliamentary and Jewish communal careers, who believe he is being hounded by various individuals determined to end his otherwise unblemished record of service to politics and in the fight against anti-Semitism and for Israel.

Janner has been subjected to at least three police investigations by the Leicestershire Police, who cover the area of his parliamentary constituency of Leicester West and previously Leicester North West, and some former officers have registered complaints that no action was taken by their senior colleagues at the time, as part of an organized cover up.

It is understood that any trial will probably be conducted under the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act, which enables a judge to accept that a person is unfit to plead, but he or she can allow a “trial of the facts” to go ahead, though there can be no verdict nor sentence save for a hospital or supervision order or to declare a total discharge for the person concerned.

In such a case, Janner would not be required to be present, though his defense team would be allowed to refute any allegations against him. All involved agree prison is not an option as in his present condition he is most unlikely to be a potential cause of harm to anyone.

In a BBC Radio interview last week, Saunders accepted that the independent review of her earlier decision could come to another conclusion, and said she would accept the advice, though she emphasized that the medical guidance had not changed and that on the basis of the medical reports “he would not be fit to be tried,” adding, “We take the medical advice and it’s not for me to question.”