Disclaimer: the posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein

If you want something removed just ask in the comments section












when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police to question the alleged perpetrators without delay;

when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police immediately to search the homes of those named for corroborative evidence;

when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to seize and examine the computers of those named at the earliest opportunity;

when allegations of rape are supported by evidence from well-respected medical and psychological experts who unanimously confirm not only that systematic abuse has taken place, but go so far as to name two of the most likely perpetrators, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe it right to dismiss their testimony and allow those named to leave the country;

when a school doctor twice reports an under-age girl to be at risk, and that girl’s headmaster - one of those subsequently named as a serial rapist - consistently fails to alert the child’s mother or to take any steps to protect her, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe this to be the normal behaviour of a responsible, and guiltless, person;

when a case of rape is reported by a girl with speech difficulties, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to supply her with support during police interviews, but are happy to use her handicap, in this respect, to discredit her spoken evidence;

when a case of repeated multiple gang rape over many years is reported by a young girl who also names seven fellow victims, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe that, in view of the Scottish law regarding corroboration, it is absolutely essential that the police question those she has named immediately.

When an acknowledged victim of rape receives a substantial award from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, you, as representative of the Crown Office, feel justified in continuing to maintain that the allegations on which this award was based were fully investigated and found to be false.


The document produced by the Police Complaints Commission for Scotland included the lines. "The position, as far as I can determine it, is that there seems a sufficiency of evidence to accept, on the balance of probability, that X was sexually abused, and that this has included penetration of her private parts. Given that X, because of her disabilities, has been closely supervised throughout her life, the perpetrator is most likely to have been someone close to her who had regular, unsupervised access.”


Re Alex Salmond's non-compliance with the Information Commissioner until threatened with criminal proceedings: in Scotland's only independent law magazine, The Firm, 11 July 2011, we read: 'Last month the Scottish Ministers were compelled by the Information Commissioner to address a series of questions put to the First Minister in correspondence in relation to the (Hollie Greig) case in January this year, the first of which was: “When did you first become aware of the allegations made by Hollie Greig about her being abused by members of a high-ranking paedophile ring in Scotland?” The commissioner required the Scottish Ministers to respond by today’s date or risk being held in contempt of court.' A letter to Robert Green from the Information Commissioner dated 10 April 2014 states: 'I am writing in response to your letter of 6 April 2014 ... in which you asked for the date on which the Commissioner issued the decision referenced in the Firm Magazine's articles. The Commissioner's decision was issued on 26 May 2011.' It was not until they were under threat of criminal proceedings that the First Minister's Office came up with an answer, saying it was impossible to give a date, since all the relevant records had been lost. However, the magazine goes on to say, 'The Firm has seen correspondence from the Crown Office dated 23 July 2009 addressed to the Greig family’s lay representative Robert Green, which suggests that correspondence addressed to the First Minister outlining the allegations was received over two years ago.' Re the likely validity of Hollie Greig's claims, The Firm writes, 'Greig received a payout of £13,500 from the criminal injuries compensation authority, and was described by Detective Inspector Iain Allen of Grampian Police as “a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim.” ' Ample expert witness statements from respected police and medical professionals, including Hollie's school doctor, back up her allegations. Of 22 persons named by Hollie as abusers, only two (her father and her brother) have ever been even superficially questioned by the police. Even though her father and brother were described in a police report as having 'a predilection for very young girls', they were allowed to go abroad to Portugal, where they run a business connected called 'Daisy Chain' which involves frequent travel to and from South America. The implication of the Crown Office's claim that 'a thorough investigation has taken place' is, therefore, that a thorough investigation does not require those accused by an acknowledged victim to be interrogated, nor does it require their computers to be seized or their homes searched before despoliation of evidence occurs.

Saturday, 23 July 2016


50 Proven Links The Royal’s Have to Sex Offenders Such As Jimmy Savile

50 Proven Links The Royal’s Have to Sex Offenders Such As Jimmy Savile

Why do the British royal family employ and befriend so many pedophiles and sex offenders?
Why do the British royal family employ and befriend so many pedophiles and sex offenders such as Jimmy Savile?
Below are 50 reasons why The Royal Family should be forced to answer police questions for the UK’s Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse:
  1. 16 year old Palace employee, Andrew, Geoffrey Dickens MP said members of Royal Household abused him
  2. Prince Andrew, Duke of York, child abuse allegation (see also Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell)
  3. Sathya Sai Baba, alleged to have sexually assaulted children for decades
  4. Sir Philip Bailhache, alleged to have manoeuvred to discourage CSA victims from testifying / Haute Garenne
  5. Bishop Peter Ball, prosecuted for child abuse
  6. Peter Bick, child abuse allegation
  7. Lord Benjamin Britten, questions over relationships with children
  8. Sir Anthony Blunt, child abuse allegation / Elm Guest House
  9. Sir Arthur Charles Clarke, child abuse allegations
  10. Robert Coghlan, convicted of importing 109 obscene tapes, 70 containing child pornography
  11. Michael Colvin MP, allegation that he ‘arranged’ a fire that killed 5 witnesses to child sexual abuse
  12. Lance Corporal of Horse Simon Wyn-Davies, convicted of raping child under 13 [wife also convicted]
  13. Jeffrey Epstein, convicted of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution
  14. Ghislaine Maxwell, alleged ‘high-class madame’ & ‘co-conspirator’ in Epstein’s sexual abuse & sex trafficking
  15. Michael Fawcett, rape allegation
  16. Reginald Forester-Smith, convicted of sustained child abuse involving his two daughters
  17. Lord Justice Fulford, founder member of a campaign to defend the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE)
  18. Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, child abuse allegation
  19. Patrick Gilbert, convicted of child abuse offences
  20. Gary Goldsmith, pimp allegation
  21. Nicholas Greaves, convicted of child pornography
  22. Stuart Hall, child abuse allegation
  23. Rolf Harris, convicted child abuser
  24. Sir Peter Hayman, child abuse allegation
  25. Benjamin Herman, child abuse allegation
  26. Commander Tom Herman, child abuse images allegation
  27. Charles Nicholas Hornby, convicted for participating in a male prostitution ring that preyed on runaway boys
  28. Paul Kidd, convicted of child abuse offences
  29. Richard Langley, child abuse allegation / Elm Guest House
  30. Anthony Lee, convicted of child abuse offences
  31. Lord Louis Mountbatten, child abuse allegation / Kincora
  32. Lance Corporal Mark Neal, alleged conspiracy to sexually assault a child and possessing indecent images
  33. John Phillips, child abuse (incest and rape) allegation
  34. Harbinder Singh Rana, convicted rapist
  35. Jonathan Rees-Williams, convicted of sex attacks on children
  36. Dylan Roberts, rape conviction
  37. Sir Jimmy Savile, thought to be one of the world’s most prolific child abusers and sex offenders
  38. Stephen Salmon, convicted of child abuse
  39. Douglas Slade, on bail for multiple counts of child abuse
  40. William Tallon, sexual predator allegation
  41. Ross Thomas, convicted of child abuse
  42. (Thomas) George Thomas, 1st Viscount Tonypandy, child abuse allegation
  43. David Tracey, charged with four counts of making indecent images of children
  44. Commander Michael Trestrail, child abuse allegation / Elm Guest House
  45. Sir Laurens van der Post, child rape allegation
  46. Gore Vidal, suspected of child abuse by his half-sister and nephew
  47. The Very Rev Ronald Selby Wright, child abuse allegation
  48. Guardsmen (unspecified number) of the Queen’s Household Cavalry, 1967 vice ring allegation
  49. 100 soldiers in the Queen’s Household Cavalry, 1976 vice ring allegation
  50. Coldstream Guardsmen at the Buckingham Palace barracks, 2004 sexual assault and rape allegation
With this many links to sex offenders shouldn’t they be required to answer some very pressing questions? What do you think? Comment below.





Joe Kerr
Quick question/request:
Can anyone identify and/or provide links to material posted by this guy…….
A video he once posted in relation to Hampstead has come to attention, more information on him is needed.


  •   Image result for BIG FAT ZERO
    The medical reports are inconclusive at best. The one sign that abuse might have taken place was only found in the girl (RAD), without any other supporting signs. The same thing is found in non-abused children. So abuse is not a forgone conclusion at all.
    That being said the case isn't over as the police are still seeking Ella and Abe.




Joe Kerr
I checked with the Police before posting:
‘No UK Police force has any jurisdiction over the civil matter of defamation, i.e. simply “making false allegations” about someone.’
So I’m afraid you’ve been mislead on that score Farmer Giles.
The Police can only get involved when a course of conduct amounts to harassment or offers a threat to good order. That’s why Belinda was ‘spoken to’ and advised by MET officers at the request of what would have been at the time Central Scotland Police, in connection with her alleged involvement in an incident near the Dunblane home of the former Lord Advocate.
All but two of the alleged abusers are absolutely eliminated by the part of the ‘story’ they’re connected to itself! It just doesn’t hold water! And of course they would have a good case to sue anyone defaming them. But that’s an expensive long and emotionally-traumatic process. and it’s only worth suing if the target has substantial assets – McKenzie does.
These are the two reasons are why she’s fallen silent on that part of the story.
The two who AREN’T eliminated are indeed resident abroad. They are actually implicated by evidence-based legal opinion. But only in relation to the historical abuse that the CICA paid out on; not the whole satanic ring thing. That abuse is unprosecutable as it cannot possibly be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. But, by virtue of that legal opinion, there is good defensible reason to form and express the OPINION that they were involved in Hollie’s abuse. – That is why she ‘settled for two’ alleged abusers.
Personally I am of the opinion that Belinda McKenzie is a woman of no integrity, and I do not believe that she believes the stories she sells. And that’s what it’s all about for her, just selling stories.


After Trading Sex with 11-Year-Old Daughter For Heroin, Mom Gives Her a Disgusting ‘Reward’

April Corcoran comes from the small town of Pleasant Plain, Ohio, just 45 minutes northeast of Cincinnati.
From the outside it looks like any other sleepy little Ohio farm town, but last year Corcoran, a 32-year-old mother who resides there, admitted to police that she traded sex with her 11-year-old daughter for heroin.
Video: Daughter-for-heroin mom gets 51 years in prison
She has now learned her fate in court.
Image Credit: Hamilton County Sheriff's Office
Image Credit: Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office
Corcoran was indicted back in March of 2015 after an investigation uncovered that 42-year-old drug dealer Shandell Willingham had been having sex with the woman’s young daughter in exchange for drugs.
According to WKRC, this horrific crime happened on four separate occasions. The little girl was sodomized, raped, and forced to perform oral sex, all while being videotaped by the drug dealer.
Corcoran also forced her daughter to take heroin on numerous occasions as a “reward” for the various sex acts she performed.
Image Credit: Dearborn County Sheriff's Department
Image Credit: Dearborn County Sheriff’s Department
The grandmother of the abused girl, Sylvia Corcoran, was shocked and horrified by her daughter’s actions, telling the court:
“I viewed the tape. I saw my granddaughter. I heard her small voice. It was horrific, very horrific. How could she do this? How could she do this? I don’t know if my granddaughter is going to be able to have a normal life.”
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine told Fox 8 Cleveland that this incident is unfortunately all too common. Human trafficking occurs far more often in the United States than many would think:
“Many people mistakenly think that human trafficking only happens in foreign countries, but this case shows that children are trafficked here in Ohio, and, sadly, some are trafficked by the very people who should be protecting them.”
“Human trafficking is a reprehensible crime, and law enforcement throughout the state is focused on holding traffickers accountable and helping victims escape servitude.”
At least Corcoran isn’t getting away with it. Since being arrested for the crime, her face has been all over social media and the local news:
Her sentence is anything but lenient: 51 years in prison.
According to CBS News, Judge Leslie Ghiz did not hear Corcoran ask for her daughter’s forgiveness, which helped the judge make her decision.
Judge Ghiz did not hold back when addressing Corcoran:
“I can honestly say that, in three-and-a-half years on the bench, this is by far the worst thing that has come before this court. I don’t know that you grasp the damage that has been done to this poor child.”
“You showed no kind of mercy.”
Corcoran pled guilty to trafficking in persons, complicity to rape, endangering children, and corrupting another with drugs.
Shandell Willingham faces charges including rape, gross sexual imposition and trafficking in persons; he is due in court on August 10th.
The girl is now living out of state with her father and stepmother. She is undergoing medical care but continues to have suicidal thoughts.
According to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center, there have been over 1,600 reported cases so far this year. There have been over 20,000 reported cases since 2007.

Related Posts

Copyright © 2016 Independent Journal Review

Thatcher aide ‘had sex with underage boys’

Thatcher aide ‘had sex with underage boys’

Nicholas Hellen Published: 21 October 2012
Edwina Currie. She wrote about a ‘pederast’ MP Edwina Currie wrote about a ‘pederast’ MP (Ferdaus Shamim)
EDWINA CURRIE, the former Conservative minister, has claimed that a leading Tory MP during Margaret Thatcher’s era had sex with underage boys — and senior party members had covered up for him.
Currie, 66, said this weekend she had heard that Sir Peter Morrison, Thatcher’s parliamentary private secretary and deputy chairman of the party, had sex with 16-year-old boys when the age of consent was 21.
“Was he doing anything illegal? Almost certainly. Would it be illegal today? Hard to tell now the age of consent is down to 16,” she said.
Morrison had been in charge of Thatcher’s disastrous leadership campaign team in 1990 when she lost power. He died aged 51 in 1995.
Currie said Morrison had been protected by a “culture of sniggering, of giggling and of nudge-nudge, wink-wink” as well as by the difficulties of getting cases to court at that time.
She had first aired the

Unleash 'pandemonium'

Youth worker taking up named-person role says scheme will unleash 'pandemonium'

Youth worker taking up named-person role says scheme will unleash 'pandemonium'
Youth worker taking up named-person role says scheme will unleash 'pandemonium'
A youth worker due to become a named person has warned the controversial Scottish Government policy will unleash "pandemonium".
Dr Simon Knight, a senior youth worker in Glasgow, described plans to assign a single point of contact such as a teacher or health visitor to look out for the welfare of every child as "rotten".
Writing in the Herald newspaper, he said he had recently discovered he was to become a named person for young people who have left school but who are still under 18, and raised fears a combination of guidelines and a risk-averse approach would "transform" minor concerns.
Read more: John Swinney sticks to his guns as he prepares for named person battle
He said: "Despite the anticipated endless list of protocols, some individuals will be more enthusiastic or risk-averse than others.
"These days there are no such things as accidents. In retrospect, everything has a causal set of occurrences that 'could have been avoided'.
"It's easy to be wise after the event but named persons will be tracking concerns forward and predicting future outcomes for every child - including your child."
Herald Scotland:
He said the policy would "inevitably" increase the workloads of named persons and questioned what would happen if they went on holiday or sick leave.
"Because it is a legal obligation and because no-one wants to get blamed, minor issues will be prioritised over other important work.
"Cases of serious harm will inevitably get lost in all the clutter."
He continued: "I think the Scottish Government is beginning to recognise the pandemonium that it is about to unleash and is looking for a way to water down the proposals.
Read more: John Swinney blasts 'named person' critics over Liam Fee comments
"It was no accident that the First Minister used the term 'entitlement' instead of 'obligation'.But the whole thing is rotten.
"Parents are infinitely more consistent than any state guardian. Just because things aren't ideal doesn't make them problematic. Just who do these people think they are?