Friday, 21 November 2014

Sheffield United rapist to go abroad,JERSEY?

Rapist Ched Evans may move abroad as ''not one club expresses interest in signing him''


The disgraced striker was to train with former team Sheffield United until bosses caved in to demands from furious fans, celebrity supporters and MPs


Snub: Evans with fiancee Natasha Massey; and inset, in action for Blades

Rapist footballer Ched Evans may have to move abroad to play again as no British clubs want him.
The disgraced striker was on course for a return to training with his former team Sheffield United until bosses caved in to demands from furious fans, celebrity supporters and MPs to block the move.
And other clubs across the country are apparently now wary of signing him after his ­rape conviction.
But it also emerged ­Sheffield United chiefs were split over the decision to scrap their offer to allow the player to train with them, despite issuing a statement condemning his actions.
One chief blamed “mob rule” for the U-turn.
Clubs would have to register Evans, who was on £20,000 a week at The Blades, with the FA if they wanted to sign him.
But a Football League source said: “Not a single club has expressed any interest in signing him.
"There is no doubt not only Sheffield United but just about every club in the country has been taken aback at the strength of feeling about his case.
“As he is struggling to even train with fellow pros in this country, his best bet may be to go abroad and rebuild his career.”
Below: Ched Evans In Wilmslow With Girlfriend Natasha Massey
On Thursday, United withdrew its offer to allow Evans to train with the club after a string of patrons, including pop star Paul Heaton, TV presenter Charlie Webster and singer Dave Berry quit in protest.
It said: “The club condemns rape and violence of any kind against women.”
But co-chairman Jim Phipps tonight made it clear there were divisions among board members over the about-turn.
He insisted Evans should have been given another chance.
Mr Phipps said: “The influence of mob-like ­behaviour has made it ­difficult to take the simple step of allowing Ched to train.
"I’m angry we are not able to get a chance to do for this footballer what should be done.”

The Professional ­Footballers’ Association said Evans, who has never accepted his guilt or ­apologised to his 19-year-old victim, should be allowed to resume his career.
But it accepted that should not be at Sheffield United.
A spokesman said today: “A return to society and a ­contribution to the ­community through employment is a key element of rehabilitation.
“It is hoped that Ched will be given an opportunity at another club to return to the job he is trained to do.”
Evans was released last month after serving half of his five-year sentence.

Has Sheffield United finally made the right decision?

  • YES
    71%
  • NO
    29%

EXARO AT THE FRONT

COMPLAINTS FLICK

COMPLAINTS FLICK: Law Society of Scotland & ‘independent’ Scottish Legal Complaints Commission team up to produce video on how to complain about a rogue lawyer
Legal regulators SLCC and Law Society launch complaints process video. IN A MOVE seen as an attempt to combat publicity about poor regualtion of the legal profession and few if any prosecutions of dodgy lawyers ripping off their clients, the Law Society of Scotland and the ‘independent’ Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC) have teamed up to produce a public video explaining the process for making a complaint about a solicitor in Scotland.
The ‘help’ video, which begins with a claim that most people are happy with their solicitors and have no reason to question services provided, or demands for sky high legal fees without any real evidence of work, can be viewed on the SLCC’s website here: SLCC and Law Society of Scotland joint video on the complaints process or on the Vimeo hosting website directly here: Making a complaint about a solicitor
The video on how to complain about a rogue solicitor appears along with another video clip - Scottish Legal Complaints Commission - Mediation video, also produced by the SLCC which claims to document the process of mediation. However, some users of the mediation service have referred to their mediation experiences as less than satisfactory, and little more than a delaying tactic used by law firms who attempt to escape complaints investigations.
 
 
Commenting on the video, Matthew Vickers, the current Chief Executive of the SLCC said: “Having dealt with legal complaints over the past six years, we appreciate that the current process is complex and can be a difficult one for clients to understand.   I welcome this video – which we have made in partnership with the Law Society of Scotland – as a valuable tool to inform the public about how the legal complaints process works, and the stages within it.”
Carole Ford, convener of the Law Society of Scotland’s Regulatory Committee, welcomed the video: “The vast majority of people are very happy with the service they receive from their solicitor, but it’s important that those who are not satisfied know that they have somewhere to go, and that there are processes in place that can help resolve any issues.  The Law Society has worked closely with the SLCC on this joint venture and I think we have successfully produced a valuable tool that could go a long way to helping the public understand the complaints process from start to finish.”
Susan McPhee, Citizens Advice Scotland’s Head of Policy and Communications added: “We welcome this video from the Law Society of Scotland and the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission.  Consumers in Scotland need clear routes to resolve issues they have with solicitors – and these routes need to be easily understood by consumers.  This video provides a gateway for consumers to find out what they need to do, and what their solicitors are obliged to do if there is a disagreement.  I hope it is used by consumers to ensure rights are respected and protected.”
MEDIA: LAWYERS BEHAVING BADLY:
Legal insiders say the SLCC & Law Society decided to make the video clip in response to increasing media coverage of dodgy solicitors and the public’s reaction to constant legal rip offs and poor regulation which came into focus with the BBC’s Lawyers Behaving Badly programme - which featured reports on poor regulation of Scotland’s legal profession, along with a host of crooked lawyers still going about their business.
Alistair Cockburn, Chair, Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal. Of note in the programme was the Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal (SSDT) Chairman’s attitude towards solicitors accused of dishonesty in their representation of clients legal affairs. During the programme, it became clear that dishonesty among lawyers in Scotland is treated less severely, compared to how English regulators treat dishonesty.
English QCs speaking on the programme were unequivocal that dishonesty is a striking off offence south of the border, while the appearance through the years in Scotland has been Scots lawyers are simply given a slap on the wrist, or a merit badge for dishonesty by their colleagues in the regulation game.
Sam Poling asks: The Scottish Solicitors’ Discipline Tribunal hears all serious conduct cases against solicitors. Last year they struck off nine of them. But is this robust enough?
Alistair Cockburn Chairman, Scottish solicitors discipline tribunal replies: It is robust in the sense that it doesn’t just give convictions on the basis that somebody’s brought before us charged by the Law Society.  We are mindful, particularly when reminded of the lay members, of a duty to the public.
One is always concerned when there is deception but you can have a situation where solicitors simply lose their place. They make false representations in order to improve their client’s position, not necessarily their own. And you would take that into account in deciding what the penalty was but there’s no suggestion that such conduct wasn’t deemed to be professional as conduct. 
Sam Poling: So there are levels of dishonesty which sit comfortably with you, satisfactorily with you?
Alistair Cockburn: No it’s not a question of saying sitting comfortably with me.  I’ve told you…
Sam Poling: OK that you would accept?
Alistair Cockburn: No I’d be concerned on any occasion that a solicitor was guilty of any form of dishonesty.  One has to assess the extent to which anyone suffered in consequence of that dishonesty.  You have to take into consideration the likelihood of re-offending and then take a decision.  But you make it sound as if it’s commonplace.  It isn’t.  Normally dishonesty will result in striking-off.
English QC’s agree ‘dishonesty’ is a striking off offence no matter what. The SSDT Chairman’s comments on dishonesty astounded viewers, and compared starkly with the comments of the English QC’s who said dishonesty was undoubtedly a striking off offence.
Andrew Hopper QC: “I cant get my head round borrowing in this context. Somebody explain to me how you can borrow something without anyone knowing about it. That’s just taking.”
Andrew Boon Professor of Law, City University, London: “They actually say in the judgement they would have struck him off but the client hadn't complained.”
Andrew Hopper QC “We’re dealing with a case of dishonesty and that affects the reputation of the profession. I would have expected this to result in striking off.”
Andrew Boon, Professor of Law: “The critical thing is the risk factor. If somebody has been dishonest once the likelihood is that they are going to be dishonest again unless they’re stopped.”
As Sam Poling went on to report: “but he [O’Donnell] wasn't stopped. The tribunal simply restricted his license so that he had to work under the supervision of another solicitor.”

No comments:

OUR MOST POPULAR POST THIS MONTH

News

Scottish inquiry could help Hollie Greig campaigner

(13060237)
(13060237)
First published in News Warrington Guardian: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter
AN Appleton man's campaign for a Down's syndrome girl allegedly abused by a paedophile ring could benefit from a proposed public inquiry in Scotland.
Labour MSP and justice spokesman Graeme Pearson is calling for an inquiry into historical cases of child sex abuse in Scotland, amid claims abuse was widespread.
The Scottish Government is due to make a decision on whether to hold an inquiry by Christmas.
Rob Green, aged 68, of Birchdale Road, has headed the long-running campaign on behalf of Hollie Greig, who claims to have been abused for 14 years by people in positions of power in Aberdeen.
The allegations have been reported to Grampian Police, but no arrests have been made, due to a lack of 'corroborative' evidence
An email from Mr Pearson, a former senior police officer, has indicated he believes Hollie's claims 'will benefit' should an inquiry be launched.
In the email, he said: "Should I be successful in my efforts I have no doubt your campaign will benefit alongside many others."
Mr Green said: "All we have ever asked for is a formal investigation into the evidence provided by Hollie."

ALTERNATIVE NEWS

Related Articles

DIRTY DUTCH BASTARDS

Ban lifted on pro-paedophilia group in The Netherlands


By JS2
Screen Shot 2014-11-13 at 13.07.27

A Dutch appeals court has lifted a ban on an organisation which lobbies for the legalisation of sex between adults and children, after finding that the group was not breaking any laws in The Netherlands.
A civil court in the north-eastern town of Assen last year ordered the Martijn foundation to disband, saying its stance was “a grave infraction of the values of our society”.
But an appeals court in Leeuwarden has ruled that the group, which claims it does not promote sexual abuse and insists it is “a platform for discussion of paedophilia”, could not be outlawed because its existence did not threaten society, the Dutch News website reported.
The court accepted arguments a group lobbying for paedophilia did go against “certain principles in the Dutch criminal system” but argued society was strong enough to withstand such “undesirable statements and abhorrent behaviour” without banning it.
And while a number of its members have been jailed on child pornography charges, the court found that the words and photographs on the organisation’s website did not break any laws.
The head of the organisation, Martijn Uittenbogaard, said the group’s 60 members would meet to decide what to do next.
Christian groups said they would continue to try to change the law and get the group, which is widely reviled in the country, banned.
Tagged: Martijn, Netherlands, Pro Paedophilia group Visit Site

MORE VID LINKS


More on this story