DISCLAIMER

NOT PRO OR ANTI INDEPENDENCE ON THIS BLOG

JUST PRO JUSTICE PRO HOLLIE ROBERT AND RUSTY

:
NOT LEFT RIGHT OR LIBERAL NO COLOUR NO RACE NO RELIGION ONE GOAL NONCE WARS PICK A SIDE CAUSE WE ARE GOING TO GRIND YOU INTO THE DIRT




Disclaimer: the posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein


If you want something removed just ask in the comments section or send a e mail


####################################################################

HOLLIE GREIGS CASE WAS NEVER INVESTIGATED

AT ROBERT GREENS TRIAL 9 PEOPLE WERE ASKED

IF THEY HAD BEEN INTERVIEWED ABOUT HOLLIES ABUSE.

THEY ALL ANSWERED NO!.


ABUSED

PAID OFF

NEVER INVESTIGATED

COVERED UP




HOLLIE GREIG THE QUESTIONS


HOLLIE GREIG THE QUESTIONS


when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police to question the alleged perpetrators without delay;


when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police immediately to search the homes of those named for corroborative evidence;



when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to seize and examine the computers of those named at the earliest opportunity;


when allegations of rape are supported by evidence from well-respected medical and psychological experts who unanimously confirm not only that systematic abuse has taken place, but go so far as to name two of the most likely perpetrators, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe it right to dismiss their testimony and allow those named to leave the country;


when a school doctor twice reports an under-age girl to be at risk, and that girl’s headmaster - one of those subsequently named as a serial rapist - consistently fails to alert the child’s mother or to take any steps to protect her, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe this to be the normal behaviour of a responsible, and guiltless, person;


when a case of rape is reported by a girl with speech difficulties, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to supply her with support during police interviews, but are happy to use her handicap, in this respect, to discredit her spoken evidence;


when a case of repeated multiple gang rape over many years is reported by a young girl who also names seven fellow victims, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe that, in view of the Scottish law regarding corroboration, it is absolutely essential that the police question those she has named immediately.


When an acknowledged victim of rape receives a substantial award from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, you, as representative of the Crown Office, feel justified in continuing to maintain that the allegations on which this award was based were fully investigated and found to be false.

THE FACTS

The document produced by the Police Complaints Commission for Scotland included the lines. "The position, as far as I can determine it, is that there seems a sufficiency of evidence to accept, on the balance of probability, that X was sexually abused, and that this has included penetration of her private parts. Given that X, because of her disabilities, has been closely supervised throughout her life, the perpetrator is most likely to have been someone close to her who had regular, unsupervised access.”

THE FACTS CONT

Re Alex Salmond's non-compliance with the Information Commissioner until threatened with criminal proceedings: in Scotland's only independent law magazine, The Firm, 11 July 2011, we read: 'Last month the Scottish Ministers were compelled by the Information Commissioner to address a series of questions put to the First Minister in correspondence in relation to the (Hollie Greig) case in January this year, the first of which was: “When did you first become aware of the allegations made by Hollie Greig about her being abused by members of a high-ranking paedophile ring in Scotland?” The commissioner required the Scottish Ministers to respond by today’s date or risk being held in contempt of court.' A letter to Robert Green from the Information Commissioner dated 10 April 2014 states: 'I am writing in response to your letter of 6 April 2014 ... in which you asked for the date on which the Commissioner issued the decision referenced in the Firm Magazine's articles. The Commissioner's decision was issued on 26 May 2011.' It was not until they were under threat of criminal proceedings that the First Minister's Office came up with an answer, saying it was impossible to give a date, since all the relevant records had been lost. However, the magazine goes on to say, 'The Firm has seen correspondence from the Crown Office dated 23 July 2009 addressed to the Greig family’s lay representative Robert Green, which suggests that correspondence addressed to the First Minister outlining the allegations was received over two years ago.' Re the likely validity of Hollie Greig's claims, The Firm writes, 'Greig received a payout of £13,500 from the criminal injuries compensation authority, and was described by Detective Inspector Iain Allen of Grampian Police as “a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim.” ' Ample expert witness statements from respected police and medical professionals, including Hollie's school doctor, back up her allegations. Of 22 persons named by Hollie as abusers, only two (her father and her brother) have ever been even superficially questioned by the police. Even though her father and brother were described in a police report as having 'a predilection for very young girls', they were allowed to go abroad to Portugal, where they run a business connected called 'Daisy Chain' which involves frequent travel to and from South America. The implication of the Crown Office's claim that 'a thorough investigation has taken place' is, therefore, that a thorough investigation does not require those accused by an acknowledged victim to be interrogated, nor does it require their computers to be seized or their homes searched before despoliation of evidence occurs.

Saturday, 25 February 2017

SUNNY AND ICKEY RIGHTY

Sunnyclaribel Retweeted Matthew Scott
David appears to be bloody good at spotting paedophiles .......... I'm glad he had the guts to speak out.
Sunnyclaribel added,

POPE LOVES NONCES FACT!

Pope cuts penalties for paedophile priests - including one let off with just a lifetime of prayer for abusing five young boys 

  • Pope Francis said to be applying his vision of a 'merciful church' to sex offenders 
  • He reduced sentence for Rev Mauro Inzoli from defrocking to lifetime of prayer 
  • But Vatican spokesman said abusive priests are also removed from the ministry
Pope Francis has been slammed by church officials and sex abuse survivors for cutting penalties for paedophile priests.
The Pope is said to be applying his vision of a 'merciful church' to sex offenders by reducing punishments to weaker sentences, such as a lifetime of prayer and penance.
It has been revealed by church officials that Pope Francis overruled advice given to him by the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about two priests  - allowing them to be punished by a lifetime of prayer.
Pope Francis has been slammed by church officials and sex abuse survivors for giving softer sentences to paedophile priests
Pope Francis has been slammed by church officials and sex abuse survivors for giving softer sentences to paedophile priests
He overruled two sentences given by the Vatican to paedophil priests, including Reverend Mauro Inzoli, who was later convicted by an Italian criminal court
He overruled two sentences given by the Vatican to paedophil priests, including Reverend Mauro Inzoli, who was later convicted by an Italian criminal court
One of the priests was the Reverend Mauro Inzoli, who was found guilty of abusing young boys by the Vatican in 2012 and was ordered to be defrocked.
However, he appealed, and in 2014 Francis reduced the penalty to a lifetime of prayer, prohibiting him from celebrating Mass in public or being near children, barring him from his diocese and ordering five years of psychotherapy.
Rev Inzoli was then convicted by an Italian criminal court for his sex crimes against five children as young as 12.
He is now facing a second church trial after new evidence emerged against him.
His predecessor Pope Benedict XVI defrocked 800 priests during his eight-year papacy
His predecessor Pope Benedict XVI defrocked 800 priests during his eight-year papacy
A church official has said some paedophile priests and their high-ranking friends appealed to Pope Francis by citing the pope's own words about mercy in their petitions.
They said: 'With all this emphasis on mercy ... he is creating the environment for such initiatives.' 
Marie Collins, an abuse survivor and founding member of Francis' sex-abuse advisory commission, expressed dismay that the congregation's recommended penalties were being weakened.
She said: 'All who abuse have made a conscious decision to do so. Even those who are paedophiles, experts will tell you, are still responsible for their actions. They can resist their inclinations.'

Many canon lawyers and church authorities argue that defrocking paedophiles can put society at greater risk because the church no longer exerts control over them.
They argue that keeping the men in restricted ministry, away from children, enables superiors to exert some degree of supervision.
But Ms Collins said the church must also take into account the message that reduced canonical sentences sends to both survivors and abusers.
'While mercy is important, justice for all parties is equally important,' she said.
'If there is seen to be any weakness about proper penalties, then it might well send the wrong message to those who would abuse.'
Comparatively, his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, rarely granted clemency petitions and defrocked 800 priests, who had raped and molested children, during his eight-year papacy.  
According to the church official, Pope Francis also ordered three staffers to be dismissed – two of whom worked for the discipline section that handles sex abuse cases.
Marie Collins, an abuse survivor and founding member of Francis' sex-abuse advisory commission, expressed dismay that the congregation's recommended penalties were being weakened
She said: 'All who abuse have made a conscious decision to do so'
Marie Collins, an abuse survivor and founding member of Francis' sex-abuse advisory commission, expressed dismay that the congregation's recommended penalties were being weakened
Pope Francis urges politicians to stop hurling insults and listen
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
LIVE
Mute
00:00
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration Time 1:17
Fullscreen
Need Text
Video Quality
576p
540p
360p
270p
MinimizeExpandClose
But Vatican spokesman Greg Burke said they will be replaced and staffing is set to be strengthened after the Pope approved hiring more officials.
He said: 'The speed with which cases are handled is a serious matter and the Holy Father continues to encourage improvements in this area.'
He also dispelled rumours that sex-abuse cases would no longer be handled by the congregation, saying the strengthened office would handle all submitted cases.
Mr Burke added the Pope's emphasis on mercy applied to 'even those who are guilty of heinous crimes' and priests who are found to be abusers are permanently removed from the ministry but are not necessarily defrocked.
He said: 'The Holy Father understands that many victims and survivors can find any sign of mercy in this area difficult, but he knows that the Gospel message of mercy is ultimately a source of powerful healing and of grace.' 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4259164/Pope-quietly-trims-sanctions-sex-abusers-seeking-mercy.html#ixzz4ZijHtdKq
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook